Plane Takeoff Failures Caught On Camera

Spread The Viralist



Plane Takeoff Failures Caught On Camera
SUBSCRIBE: https://bit.ly/3at7ljZ

► Music Licensed From SoundStripe/Envato Elements

For any and all copyright matters, please email me directly at UnderworldCopyright@gmail.com

Unless otherwise created by Most Dangerous, licenses have been obtained for images/footage in the video from the following sources; https://pastebin.com/2QefkSMq

Most Dangerous brings you some of the best Top 5’s, Top 10’s, Fails more right here on YouTube. Subscribe to Most Dangerous to never miss an upload!

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: Most Dangerous

46 Comments

  1. I don't know if anyone else noticed this in the last clip but the aircraft was not configured for takeoff. The flaps were completely retracted.

  2. English Royal Navy LMFAO… I thought Americans were getting out of the dog house with their education system but this just puts them back in the dunce corner. How has this guy got so many subscribers while being moronic?… I stopped the video at 30 seconds and moved on… you need to get an educated person to edit your works before you put them out to people as you lost all credibility after only a few seconds.

  3. The air force is the Egnlish the Royal Ireland and Northern Great Britgian of ht AirF FRoce General to the general in Northern IReland of types hte 5-16 fleet.

  4. #1 The pilot had zero degrees of flaps set for takeoff. Normally, you do not go to zero flaps until you achieve 230-250 knots, well into the climb stages of the flight. If the flaps are set correctly for takeoff, the takeoff speed for a B737-700 is between 130-150 knots. So with zero flaps, he was at least 100 knots less than the wings needed for lift. That is why he had so much trouble even though he had 13,000 feet of runway. Takeoff checklist was not followed properly, as setting the flaps is a standard part of the procedure. (BTW, the still photo just before the video clip was of a different aircraft. A B737-800. The one in the video is a 737 NG aka B737-700, which has slightly different limitations.)

  5. #6 & #5 & #3 A common occurrence in aviation and nothing spectacular. Don't include them in this video to make a drama thing out of something that happens all the time. That's just naive. BTW, it's called a "birdstrike".

  6. #7 Pilot had the F-35 in VTOL mode instead of STOVL mode. All his thrust was going downwards. It does go slightly rearward, but only a small portion for stability. That's why he went off the deck. In STOVL mode the thrust is at angle in between straight down and straight back (variable). In STOL mode, it's fully straight back like a standard aircraft. In VTOL mode it's straight down for taking off like a helicopter. He needed STOVL mode for a ramped deck aircraft carrier.

  7. Please stop saying "two thousand." It's "twenty."

    "Twenty-sixteen" … just like a hundred years earlier was "nineteen-sixteen" … not "one thousand-nine hundred-sixteen" …

  8. The Air Moroc plane, it is excessively obvious to see that the pilot forgot to extend the Flaps, ence the near impossible take off !

  9. The A-6 Intruder was a twin engine, twin seat aircraft. In this particular incident, the plane lost it's right engine during catapult launch, forcing both crew, Pilot and B/N (Bombardier/Navigator) to eject. A little more research would have produced a far more interesting video. Also, the narrator's tone and colorful graphics do not match the seriousness of the subject…

  10. Canada geese… look 'em up wherever… Canadian infers that they belong to Canada… no, they are migratory… altho, with the current admin in Canada, perhaps they have claimed ownership…?

  11. 100 million pound F-35 fighter jet…? i don't think if the plane was made completely of lead and adorned with the max amount of weapons, also made of lead, that it would even come close to 100th of that weight… might want to check your copy, or, check your guy who does the voice over to see if he is chugging martini's before starting work…

  12. An F-35 fighter FULLY loaded with maximum fuel and armaments most certainly DOES NOT weigh 100 million pounds. More like 66,000 pounds – which is 1/1,515 of that weight!!! I once had a US Navy seaman, who was conducting a tour of the USS Lexington aircraft carrier at NAS Pensacola in Florida, tell me the anchor of that ship attached to the bow weighed more than the entire aircraft carrier itself.😱🤔😮

  13. In addition to Sully's background as a military pilot, I believe it was his experience as a certified glider pilot that brought that plane down flawlessly in the Hudson.

  14. Wrong on Royal Air Maroc. No pilot error. A previous incoming plane's wake turbulence cross field disturbed the AM's path, eventually cleared. Wake turbulence can last for ~5 km.

  15. English is stupid. As soon as I heard a hundred million pound plane taking off from a carrier, my first reaction was , "Now just wait a minute!" Then it hit me. British, of course it's £100,000,000

  16. Why wouldn't a flock of geese be an issue just because you've "seen it all" as an exprienced pilot? Do the geese recognize your experience and refuse to get sucked into the jet engines?

  17. Unless my eyes are playing games,I didn't see no flaps down on that take off. The plane flared up cause the pilot pulled backed and realized he needed more speed put the nose back down.If he had flaps down he probably would of took off smoothly. But he was still close to a stall when he got air born cause he level off quickly and I'm talking about the last plane

Comments are closed.