Russia’s Massive Naval Problem – COMPILATION

Russia's Massive Naval Problem - COMPILATION
Spread The Viralist



00:20:16 – Why ALL Russian Weapons Are a FAILURE
00:38:53 – Why Russia’s Navy SUCKS
00:58:19 – Analyzing Russia’s Massive Failures in its Invasion of Ukraine
01:21:27 – How Looting Ruined the Russian Army
01:42:27 – Why Russia is Running out of Airplanes
02:04:08 – Ukraine’s New Battlefield Trick is Costing Russia MILLIONS
02:23:33 – Russia’s Massive Drone Problem
02:43:46 – Putin’s New Major Problem for Russian Military Revealed (Fighter Jets Edition)
02:57:15 – How Putin is Killing Ethnic Minorities

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: The Military Show

50 Comments

  1. 'Russia lacking credibility'. Understatement of the decade. The norm is; "If it speak, it lie". At the very, very, best Russia bring a lie by omission. -Or of course the third option, putting sentences together that makes no sense, talking gibberish.
    Russia will have a GIANT challenge for generations to come. Right now, they are unwanted, not trustworthy, dishonest, deluded and uneducated. Only a madman would reinvest in Russia as it is now. Maybe in two generations time, it will be possible again, but not before the Governmental system is reformed heavily and the mentality has changed from the current absurd Putinism.

  2. Russia Can NOT Maintaind its Military Armed Force Capability as ITS Colonized countrIes Widrew for independence or had Joined NATO. Its Naval Fleet Can Not also Secure Surveilance security around its territorial water & was target of attacks by Ukraine. Armed forces.

  3. No problem for Putin because he has so much money that can easily replace everything that was damaged or destroyed. The amount of money coming from the black market is actually making the economy and military very strong. All he has to do now is decide the date to start the nuclear war against NATO. He seems to claim that his nuclear weapons are the best in the whole world and at times try to scare his enemies with threats to launch nuclear warheads.

  4. Russia's (so called) aircraft carrier. Ain't really a aircraft carrier. It's a NATO, and US target. It quit being a show of force, or any kind of deterrent a long time ago. It's basically, a floating pile of scrap iron.

  5. It doesn't help that more state money is spent on Russian oligarchy yachts than on it's navy, no wonder that it's navy is up the creek without a paddle. Russian corruption is a great allie to the west.

  6. – Russia's naval capabilities have suffered significant setbacks, including the loss of its only aircraft carrier and a guided missile cruiser sinking, undermining its once-powerful Navy.
    – The Yassen class submarines represent a significant technological advancement for Russia, boasting stealth capabilities and the capacity to carry advanced weaponry, though their high cost raises concerns about long-term sustainability.
    – Economic constraints, including sanctions and military expenditures, pose challenges to maintaining and modernizing Russia's naval fleet.
    – Russia's Pacific Fleet has been particularly affected, limiting its ability to operate in blue water and confining it closer to coastal regions.
    – Efforts to bolster naval strength include the development of new destroyer classes and the procurement of advanced aircraft, though challenges such as aging vessels and logistical issues persist.

  7. Russia has already won this war and completed the goal to keep NATO out of Ukraine. for almost two years now and keep going . All the rest are talking . Nobody is daring to fight the bear that has no need for air carriers since that has missiles 20times sound speed that cant be stoped . Russia is not Irak Afganistan Vietnam Syria Korea Serbia Lybia …..

  8. Excellent channel. Best presentation out there. Trash free. Just clean quality video. I will subscribe. Any ad negates a subscribe. No annoying channel logos…..excellent ! I've subscribed to two channels , this one and one other.

  9. What makes me LAUGH (morbidly) is when people talk about the limits on advanced electronics on precision for the ballistic missles… R U KIDDING ME.. Do you really think it matters that the 500Kton warhead "missed" its aim point by 500 metres…

  10. We are systematically lied to all the time… In order to support a bloated military budget. How hard was it for our Intel community to find out 1) T14 Armada dont exist beyond prototypes 2) Khinzal hypersonic missles on paper defy the laws of known material science 3) Poseiden first strike nuclear torpedo drone is just that a bluff weapon as if ever used it wont take out a nuclear tirade 4) SU57 5th gen fighter,, keeps getting shot down 5) T90s,,, champions of turret toss height AND distance 5) T72 Terminator antipersonel tank gets terminated every time its seen…. I can go on… I mean a morbid but true meme is russia HAS the 2nd best army in the wor… err Ukraine.

  11. As long as Ukraine gets an AWACs (at best up to 4 – so that 2 can be in the air at all times), the F-16 ist superior plane by a mile, because it has datalink-capabilities the Russians lack, so the AWACs will provide a better radard then the F-16's own radar, this enhancing battlefield awareness and targeting capability!

  12. Of course those very officers in WW2 looted themselves! Hell, how do you think all those German firearms (from a P38 or a Luger (very highly valued by the troops, they loved nabbing these!) to a K98-K Mauser and even things like an MG-42!) ended up in the US…then again: The US as a COUNTRY was pilfering, stealing, looting equipment and patents (yes, for example the ME-262 Schwalbe jet-aircraft was stolen, as were the German Type-XXI U-Boats – the first real military submarines that weren't just ships that could submerge for a short while!) and even forcing the very people who built the weapons (Sure: Some went willingly, others because life in the US would be better for them than life in a Germany bombed to rubble with weapons that are outlawed/a war-crime if used today and would lead to the execution of the people using them – like White-Phosphorus and other incendiary weapons!)!
    Frankly: The US should fucking pay royalties on all the patents they stole, because most were owned by privat enterprise, not the Nazi-State! With interest! That would also curb imperialism a wee bit, because it would be very expensive and Germany would be rich afterwards! Same for Russia (as it's the successor state of the Soviet Union, which also looted (former) East-Germany (German Democratic Republic!))

  13. Great Job. Nicely done. Grift in the Russian military is legendary. The K-329 is a mess which should bever set out to sea. I say this because I've seen what the CIA has on her, when I was with NAVSEA. Huge issues.

  14. Why are there not submarines that Convert into aircraft when emerging from the sea? Even if only dozen play think of the surprise that all nations would have! We have Joint strike fighters,why don’t we have subs/carriers

  15. A lot of misinformation here. Russia ships are designed for defense that's why they don't have a long range. They are meant to stay local. The US is a dominant and aggressive force all over the world that is designed for expansion to be able to establish superiority anywhere on earth. The U.S. is aggressively taking over the world or at least trying. To compare a military designed for expansion and one for defense is unfair. They are not trying to dominate the world through aggression like we are in the U.S. they just want to be left alone and only want regional dominance to protect their motherland. Big difference.

  16. Every claim of Russia developing "nEw eLiTe bOdYaRmOr" is laughable since they can't even provide their troops with regular low cost standard equipment, like pants, boots and jackets forcing soldiers to buy crap from Aliexpress. Standard Russia. I bet they still grenade training with potatoes.

  17. Remember when Russia had only a few weeks more of missiles to use against Ukraine well it’s been a few years and they ain’t out of them yet what’s the point of trash talking a potential opponent it makes it so that ppl underestimate them remember we couldn’t even win against the Taliban

  18. You failed to cover the extreme importance and value of the Russian tug boat that pushes their aircraft carrier around. Given the ineptitude we have witnessed throughout Russia's entire military, it is scarry to think there are Russian sailors sacheting around the world seas with nuclear powered anything…..forget the weapons. Afterall, they have managed to sink their own ships, the landing ship D-106, when it hit its own mine, the Kursk submarine, which sunk itself with a torpedo, and the Matros Shevchenko collided with the vessel Matros Pozynich then those two vessels also reportedly collided with another anchored vessel Kavkaz-5. in 2008 a Russian nuclear subs crew acciently set off a fire supression system which resulted in the death of 20 sailors and injury to 22 others. While attempting repairs to Russia;s only aircraft carrier, The PD-50 dry dock, the largest in Russia, sank in a strange accident, smashing a huge hole in the carrier in the process. In 1995 A nuclear submarine had its electricity cut by an electricity company at a naval base due to unpaid bills. The submarine's cooling system ceased to function and the reactor "came close to meltdown. In 2003 a nuclear-powered submarine K-159 sank while it was being towed, the AS-28, a nuclear sub, sank when it became entanled in a hydrophone array. In 2006, A fire broke out in the submarine, Daniil Moskovsky…two on board died. In 2011, The Delta-IV-class nuclear submarine, Ekaterinburg, caught fire while in dry-dock. In 2015, the Orel, an Oscar II-class submarine, caught fire during repairs in a dry dock in the Severodvinsk shipyard. In 2016 The decommissioned Soviet-era nuclear submarine K-173 Krasnoyarsk caught fire while being disassembled in Vilyuchinsk, Kamchatka. IN 2017, the Russian spy ship Liman sank off the Turkish coast, 29 km from Kilyos, after colliding with a freighter. IN 2018, The Admiral Kuznetsov was damaged while undergoing a refit: the dry dock sank. In 2019, The Admiral Kuznetsov, caught fire during repair work at Murmansk. 2019, 1 July – A navy research submersible, thought to be AS-12 Losharik, suffered a fire and 14 crew members died due to fume inhalation…..and yada, yada, yada.

  19. I mean no offense, but the Russians likely have more 1960s weapons than people to hold them. From 1 rifle for 10 men to 10 rifles per man. Impressive, when you have numbers….

  20. my latest known was , as i provide that as future off naval warfare , heavy coved class massproduce might hydrogen propulsion,enihne not more the 30 perosn 3 shift , 4-6 mitibel over event horison mashin canonAi taregting Air/sight atak defense, , somposit coved frrame for anti emp/ecm warfare , as mindes 40 knots, 3 permonth bulabel abel per month (so to paln or its not ) ….perect procteion as atak vessel …

  21. Russia thinking its a big player …it is inside of Russia, but on the world stage its nothing special . They need to get rid of PooTin and chill out 👍👍

  22. I'm not sure how long ago this was written, but its way out of date with respect to missile boats.

    Russia effectively has zero.

    An ssbn is only a factor when out on patrol.

    Russia's conduct of deterrent patrols has dropped to zero.

    And the reaon is neither new nor is it related to anything high tech.

    Maintenance has been deferred far too long.

    What you see when you look at a sub isn't the hull – its superstructure.

    That space houses verious mechanicals – winches for docking, emergency signal buoys, the brow – whole hodgepodge of stuff.

    Now, when underway, everything in that superstructure is subjected to a harsh environment – a 20 mile an hour stream of salt water. The corrosive effects are daunting. Its a large part of why ssbn's have an extended maintenance period every quarter. You have to remove corrosion, chip rust and repaint, replace sacroficial anodes – a ton of work.

    When you don't do that, components intended to be secured to a mounting surface aren't.

    Thw mortal enemy of a submarine is self-generated noise.

    A noisy submarine is a dead submarine.

    Russia can make a boat that is as quiet as any.

    What they seem unable to do is keep them quiet.

    An ssbn is the highest value target there is.

    So its worth permanently assigning a fast attack boat to it – simply to follow it.

    And in a hot war, destroy it.

    Russia knew that in a shooting war, their ssbn's had a lifespan of seconds.

    So there was no point in sending them out to conduct patrols.

    And since their missiles can only be fired when the boat is underway at perisope depth, boats tied up to the pier are useless.

Comments are closed.