The Columbia Disaster Was Worse Than You Thought

Spread The Viralist



On February 1, 2003, tragedy struck the space shuttle Columbia, as earlier damage to the craft’s left wing caused the shuttle to be destroyed upon reentry, killing all seven astronauts on board. It was a tragedy felt across the world, and yet, the saddest part of all was just how preventable the disaster was. While there are always variables that you can’t plan for when going into space, the problems of the Columbia were downplayed to the astronauts on board, and no rescue mission was sent. Let’s take a look at the details of why the Columbia disaster was worse than you thought.

#NASA #Columbia #Disaster

Doomed from the start | 0:00
No further investigation | 1:25
Crew kept in the dark | 2:22
Tragedy | 2:56
A tragedy compounded | 3:53
The crew could have been saved | 4:49

Read Full Article: https://www.grunge.com/198998/the-worst-part-of-the-space-shuttle-columbia-disaster-isnt-what-you-think/

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: Grunge

37 Comments

  1. The people who sold the parts that broke off the Columbia, Challenger, and the Paul Walker / Roger Rodas’ Porsche accident, are the scum of the universe. How can these people sleep at night?

  2. Negligence, They could have had the astronauts spacewalk and check the damage to the wing. Inspection of the exterior of the shuttle prior to reentry should be protocol. Commercial truck drivers are told to inspect their trucks prior to the start of their shifts. The crew should have improvised and inspected the outside of the shuttle, for their safety.

  3. I thought it disintegrated and everybody on it died. Pretty sure that's what everybody thought. The only way it could have been worse is someone on the ground dying.

  4. What is first and foremost the biggest issue is allowing the shuttle to continue to fly knowing foam impacts were routine and caused damage. You can blame decisions in the moment by management personnel all you want, but this design was flawed from the start.

  5. Dear Editor,
    In 2003 STS-107 and it's crew were lost on re-entry due to damaged tiles. This was not the first time insulation falling off the fuel tank had damaged our shuttle. Whether a rushed rescue mission could have saved the doomed Columbia crew will never be known. But I have a feeling that Linda Ham did not want the public to know how bad the tile damage was . Why? Because life is cheap and the shuttles had squeaked through similar insulations before. Ask Hoot Gibson about his Atlantis flight.

  6. Dear Editor,
    In 2003 STS-107 and it's crew were lost on re-entry due to damaged tiles. This was not the first time insulation falling off the fuel tank had damaged our shuttle. Whether a rushed rescue mission could have saved the doomed Columbia crew will never be known. But I have a feeling that Linda Ham did not want the public to know how bad the tile damage was . Why? Because life is cheap and the shuttles had squeaked through similar insulations before. Ask Hoot Gibson about his Atlantis flight.

  7. Linda Ham put money and budget ahead of human life, that's why she wasn't held accountable, for most American institutions, money is more important than anything else.

Comments are closed.