RISK and EXPENSE On EVEREST to Remove Perished Climbers #short #everest #survival

RISK and EXPENSE On EVEREST to Remove Perished Climbers #short #everest #survival
Spread The Viralist



In 2016 three indian climbers died trying to summit Mount Everest. Two of them were abandoned by their guides near the top. In 2017, the Indian government funded an expensive mission to retrieve their bodies.

Over 300 have lost their lives on Mount Everest. Should great expense and risk be taken to remove them, or should they remain where they are as a reminder of the perils of high altitude mountaineering?

What do you think?

HERE IS A GREAT VIDEO ABOUT SURVIVING MOUNT EVEREST THAT YOU WILL LOVE:

DISCLAIMER:
Thank you for watching this video! We want to clarify that some of the footage used in this content is intended for educational purposes, providing commentary and analysis on the subject matter. We respect copyright holders and have made efforts to attribute the sources wherever possible. Our goal is to enhance the educational value of our content, fostering understanding and critical thinking. We endeavor to credit the owner of the original footage on screen for the duration of the clip that is on the screen.

If you have any concerns regarding the use of this footage, please contact us directly. We are committed to addressing any issues promptly. Thank you for your understanding.

Sincerely,
Everest Mystery

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: Everest Mystery

25 Comments

  1. …los Sherpas son los dueños y verdaderos héroes de las alturas… el resto de montañeros unos falsos, mentirosos, egoístas y hedonistas que sólo buscan su momentito de gloria…y algunos pagan con su vida ☠️‼️
    …la estupidez humana 🧔🏻🇪🇦

  2. If I was willing to risk my life to climb that mountain, I would have to accept it might become my final resting place. I would think avid mountaineers would be happy remaining in the field so to speak.

  3. Если бы я осознанно шла на Эверест и знала о вероятности моей гибели там, то я скорее всего пожелала бы там и остаться навсегда в яркой цветной одежде. 🤗❤

  4. I like the idea of leaving them up there and tagging them as MARKERS.. that way none of the climbers can ignore the REALITY AND DANGER of what they are doing. People need to be reminded of that danger, that DEATH is a real possibility.. because humans tend to forget the SERIOUSNESS of a situation when things seem “peaceful”.. like a beautiful peaceful sunset from the mountain.. but at any moments things can go terribly wrong!

  5. It depends… if the climber specifically says in conversation if there are statements by him/her that if they die up there, to leave them.. then we should respect that. If the FAMILY is religious and need the body recovered to give them their last burial rights etc.. then it should be allowed/risked to recover. If the climbers country of origin (their government) wants to retrieve it, let them.. but this is always at great RISK and they should FUND IT.

  6. It is so risky for the guides or anyone to bring them down. It's dangerous and the air is thin. Guides or Sherpas are carrying all of the gear, doing all of the work setting up camps, being in lead to put spikes in,ropes,clear areas, help the climbers up, even get them out of tight spaces. They are already doing so much of the work in a dangerous situation. They can't risk themselves and the rest of the group. Climbers should be wearing appropriate clothing, have appropriate gear, have a complete medical as the air is thin. There's bodies up there going back many many decades. If you want to risk your life for no reason, then no, a government nor the Sherpas should pay or risk their lives to bring your body down. It's an informed decision you made. A thrill not a necessity.

  7. This climb should only be allowed for certified professionals and oxygen administration should be mandatory in the death zone with no exceptions. The climb, crowded with smug amateurs and litter, is becoming even more deadly. The decades of dead bodies up there is proof that this climb should be nationally restricted-regulated to save lives. Greed and government incompetence are to blame here. Enough.

  8. It's an awkward question. If my loved one perished on the mountain, I would dearly love to have their body retrieved. However, if it was going to greatly endanger others, then I think the remains need to remain.

  9. My opinion would be that before you step foot in Nepal a deposit for removal of the trash you generate to include your dead body if that is the case, be made. Not sure who would hold deposit or how funds would be used but it seems far to inexpensive right now (true costs are not being accounted for).

Comments are closed.