You are here: Home WTF!
Previous Article
Next Article

Recommended For You

Terrifying Natural Disasters Caught on Camera (4)

【心霊カメラ】映ってはいけないものが映り込んだ…　特級心霊映像２選

Terrifying Natural Disasters Caught on Camera (6)

📚 Haunted Study Room: The Shadow That Struck 🌑 #scarytales #horrorstory #ghoststory

Terrifying Natural Disasters Caught on Camera (10)

real ghost caught on camera #horror #horrorclips #scary #peranormal #creepy #horrorhotel

About the Author: ParaBreakdown

21 Comments

  5. It looks more like a cat jumping down the stairs than a little girl, it’s got a cats colour and pattern and it looks kinda like a face at the very bottom of the blur

  8. Why do you even bother with ghosts/angels/spirits?
    Oh yeah, maybe because more Americans believe that ghosts, demons, angels, werewolves, bigfoot, and dogman are real, than believe that any of the data provided by climate science is real or that any of the evidence supporting all theories related to the mechanisms behind evolutionary biology are real.
    Sadly, sound arguments using factual data and reason are too confusing for those gullible types that prefer to believe in rumors, propaganda and tabloid style headlines over fact-based information. This is because a flashy headline and sexy image makes for a knee jerk acceptance of something they would RATHER believe, which is far easier for their small minds to digest than a fact and data based presentation that requires more reading and the processing and absorption of actual information.
    I love your channel and debunking. Sadly, judging from some of the comments after particularly adept examples of debunking, your videos are like an airplane flying far over the heads of those people who most need to see reality for what it is.
    They seem to particularly dislike any sarcasm or smugness in your narration when you expose a fraud, and then seem less likely to accept the truth when they feel slighted for their belief. Too bad.
    You can’t be walking on eggshells and apologizing for their gullible acceptance of fakes.
    Stay with it, don’t change a thing.
    Keep up the good work.
    Even if you change the opinion of a single idiot regarding their steadfast belief in some hoaxed media, at least it’s a step in the right direction for humanity.

  12. All my family's old photos posted on Facebook have Photoshop in their header. Not that I'm faking the photos. It's just easier to get the image from my scanner through Photoshop and then saving it to a jpg. So I'd take that as meaning nothing. Even my photo's taken from my digital cameras occasionally get passed through Photoshop to get saved at a better compression rate or smaller image size depending on the requirements of the site I'm uploading it too (yeah file size limits are a thing). Saying all that, I do agree about the show shutter speed being the cause of the "ghost" image.

  13. Photoshop 3 dates from 1994. Some of the close-up you showed look like film grain, and the vintage would confirm that: no such thing as a digital camera with multi-megapixel resolution and the needed latitude.
    This is a scan from a negative or print. Photoshop was bundled with scanners at that time — I recall buying a scanner that included PS and figuring that into the cost comparison.
    Photoshop was used to run the scanner and present the picture, which could then be adjusted for color balance etc. before saving (as a TGA or TIFF) *and exporting the JPEG (which you have)*.

    So, don't dismiss it for Photoshop being mentioned in the metadata. It is quite proper for it to be the Creator program, without it being edited for content.

  16. Is it just me or can anyone else see that there is a strong resemblance to Heather O'Rourke, the wee girl from the 1st 1980's movie, The Poltergeist. It wouldnt be too hard to take her image from the movie.

Comments are closed.