Matt Taibbi And Douglas Murray DISMANTLE Mainstream Journalists In HEATED DEBATE!

24 Comments

1. Malcolm is a disgrace of a man

2. This Malcolm cannot even get the names correct, of two men in the same room as him, forget about digging into facts on an actual story.

3. Im so glad that a few folks woke up to how dishonest Malcolm has ALWAYS been…….keep digging folks. Once your eyes open you will realize your neighbors arent the problem

4. They hate you with a hot hot hate. It's time you hate them back.

5. I am shocked at the ignorance and arrogance of Malcolm Gladwell. Matt Taiibi and Douglas Murray were very articulate, intelligent and hit the nail on the head.

6. So the lefty is saying that because Walter Cronkite didn’t talk about trans people every night nobody else watch the news I mean that’s just ludicrous also I noticed that he keeps diverting to race and gender and he can’t stick to the issue at hand that’s always the sign of a loser argument

7. Malcom is the only one cutting people off. Who would've thought the leftist is the one doing it?

8. Gladwell had his talking point all down before hand. Murry can't play that game with Murry, he will cut you up.

9. So there wasn't enough evidence to run a Hunter laptop story but you had enough for a Trump gets peed on story. Okay.

10. In a just universe Malcolm Gladwell would be placed in a really, really big blender and puréed live on national television.

11. I'm honestly astonished on just how comfortable Malcolm Gladwell is with the current state of mainstream media, guess I'll avoid his books in the future.

12. Murry goes beastmode

13. What a scumbag so Walter Cronkite’s not trustworthy because there weren’t black and gay people working in the industry at that time I mean what a disgrace and he’s basically saying oh we’re more trustworthy than all white men it’s just a pathetic argument I noticed they never say our work is better than other people because their work is not and I mean that towards this man only not any race or gender

14. This guy Malcolm, represents the established aristocracy. His career is built on promoting the lies of his oligarch owners. Does he actually not see how hypocritical he looks ?

15. There was no time the media was ever an instrument of Truth.

16. I'm very familiar with Matt Taibbi and Malcolm Gladwell. I'm a big fan of both men, in between the two I'll take Malcolm. Matt as of late has gone off the rails.. Unfortunately.. Matt's work covering Wall Street was outstanding, Loved all of it.

17. Matt isn't made for debates. This is for Glenn Greenwald. He'd have eviscerated Malcolm. 👊

18. Douglas Murray…..A ship of truth in a sea of bullshit.

19. Malcolm did a perfect job of representing media: victimized himself and attacked his opponents to avoid saying anything substantive at all

20. I enjoy the debate, the analysis of the debate not so much.

21. imagine having to listen to someone lie to your face for 35 mins..

22. If what Malcolm was saying had any honour or thruth, the MSM wouldn't be losing viewers year on year.

23. right out of the gate malcolm personified the left beautifully both in a debate and the msm; immediately attack, discredit, straw-man, demoralize, and pander. not once—even douglas calling out his malcolm's book's factual fallacies was mild—did either matt or douglas display any such unbecoming behaviour. apart from the aforementioned, all malcolm did was make himself look disorganized and ill-prepared by repeating or calling back to the same, and only, arguments he could make… cronkite and the 50s, conspiracy theorists, twitter… he had nothing.

    yet i doubt even after seeing how the audience shifted in the end he walked away having learned anything.

24. I will stop reading Malcolm Gladwell from now on forward

Comments are closed.